Davis v. Apperience Corporation et al
| Jack Davis |
| Apperience Corporation and BlueSprig, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv00766 |
| February 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER GRANTING 45 SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AS MOOT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014).
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER REQUESTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/22/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2014).
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER DENYING 39 MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT AND VACATING HEARING.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2014).
|
|
Filing
31
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 30 Clerks Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
|
|
Filing
25
NOTICE REGARDING FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/10/2014. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William Alsup. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 6/9/14. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
