OpenTV Inc. v. Netflix Inc.
Plaintiff: OpenTV Inc.
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Case Number: 3:2014cv01525
Filed: April 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 AMENDED STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/11/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER SETTING HEARING. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2015 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/15/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2015)
December 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)
November 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 64 STIPULATION AND E-DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/13/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014)
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON NETFLIX'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Case Management Statement due by 10/30/2014. Case Management Conference set for 11/6/2014 01:30 PM; Motion Hearing set for 11/6/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/22/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON NETFLIX'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/9/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 10/9/2014 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/30/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2014)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING 13 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed by Netflix Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 3/31/14. (mmm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OpenTV Inc. v. Netflix Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: OpenTV Inc.
Represented By: Paul David Collier
Represented By: John Richard Edwards
Represented By: George William Foster
Represented By: Russell Evan Levine
Represented By: James Brian Medek
Represented By: Greg Polins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Netflix Inc
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Zac Alexander Cox
Represented By: Daralyn J. Durie
Represented By: Laura E. Miller
Represented By: Eugene Novikov
Represented By: Clement S. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?