MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. v. Apple Inc.

MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. |
Apple Inc |
David Folsom |
3:2014cv02300 |
May 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Joseph C. Spero |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Apple Inc.. (Rahebi, Bita) (Filed on 5/29/2014) |
Filing 38 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. re 34 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, Proof of Service of Documents (Jagai, Deborah) (Filed on 5/28/2014) |
Filing 37 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp... (Huff, Winston) (Filed on 5/21/2014) |
Filing 36 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge within 14 days of this notice. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2014) |
Filing 35 CLERKS NOTICE: re Advising Counsel of Receipt of Action from the Eastern District of Texas. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2014) |
Filing 34 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2014. Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2014) |
Filing 33 Case transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 2:13-cv-00518. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Filing 31 NOTICE by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. re 26 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings, Terminate Motions,,,,,, Notice of Compliance (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Discovery Disclosure by Apple Inc. [Notice of Service of Paragraph 1 of Initial Disclosures] (Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 29 SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 23 MOTION to Change Venue filed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Winston Oliver Huff, # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Winston Oliver Huff, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of Winston Oliver Huff)(Huff, Winston) |
Filing 28 REPLY to Response to Motion re 23 MOTION to Change Venue filed by Apple Inc.. (Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re 23 MOTION to Change Venue filed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Huff, Winston) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 23 MOTION to Change Venue by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Alex S. Yap in Support of Motion to Transfer, # 2 Affidavit of Andrew Bright in Support of Motion to Transfer, # 3 Affidavit of Mark Buckley in Support of Motion to Transfer, # 4 Text of Proposed Order Granting Apple Inc.'s Motion to Transfer)(Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 22 Submission of Proposed Agreed Protective order by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 21 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling Order by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 20 Submission of Proposed Agreed Discovery order by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Designation of Mediator, Hon. David Folsom, filed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Huff, Winston) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 10/29/13. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before Judge Payne. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Courts scheduling order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within 14 days of the conference. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes.) (bga, ) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Harry Lee Gillam, Jr on behalf of Apple Inc. (Gillam, Harry) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 10/29/13. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before Judge Payne. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Court's scheduling order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within 14 days of the conference. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes.) (jml) |
Filing 17 Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2013 09:00 AM before Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Honorable Roy Payne. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/9/2013. (ch, ) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to 12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp..(Huff, Winston) |
Filing 15 ***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY please ignore*** ANSWER to 12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp..(Huff, Winston) Modified on 10/1/2013 (ehs, ). |
NOTICE that document #15 was filed in error per attorney for by Apple Inc., Please ignore (ehs, ) |
Filing 14 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Apple Inc.. (Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Apple Inc. (Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 12 APPLE INC.'s ANSWER to 1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. by Apple Inc..(Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alex S Yap on behalf of Apple Inc. (Yap, Alex) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bita Rahebi on behalf of Apple Inc. (Rahebi, Bita) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Belusko on behalf of Apple Inc. (Belusko, Vincent) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. Apple Inc. served on 8/6/2013, answer due 9/26/2013. (ehs, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is GRANTED pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Apple Inc. to 9/26/2013. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( sm, ) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Apple Inc. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Apple Inc.. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Deborah Jagai on behalf of MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. (Jagai, Deborah) |
Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Huff, Winston) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-4192904.), filed by MemSmart Semiconductor Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A)(Huff, Winston) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2013: # 3 CORRECTED) (ch, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.