United States of America, et al v. North American Health Care, et al
| United States of America, State of California, State of Arizona, State of Washington and State of Utah |
| North American Health Care, Inc. and John Sorenson |
| 3:2014cv02401 |
| May 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| William H. Orrick |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case is dismissed with prejudice as to Relator John Orten, but without prejudice as to the United States or the State of California. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/26/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to August 29, 2017 granting 114 STIPULATION. Case Management Conference set for 8/29/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 8/22/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/02/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2017)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER ON 84 MOTION TO DISMISS - Orten's FCA claims based on allegations regarding Star Ratings and upcoding are DISMISSED with prejudice. Orten's claim under Washington State law is DISMISSED with prejudice. The motion to dismiss is ot herwise DENIED. Sorensen shall file his answer within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Case Management Statement due by 4/13/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/28/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER re 75 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by North American Health Care, Inc. Attorney Richard Joseph Doren added for North American Health Care, Inc. Attorneys Jason de Bretteville, Bradley Edward Marrett and Justin Nathanael Owens terminated. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/13/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
74
Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting in part and denying in part 55 Motion to Dismiss. Orten's Third, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth causes of action for violation of the Stark Law and retaliation and wrongful discharge are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Sorensen. Orten's First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth causes of action are DISMISSED with leave to amend within thirty days of the date below. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER DENYING 51 MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE. Case Management Statement due by 9/30/2015. Case Management Conference set for 10/7/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/04/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2015)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 58 STIPULATION for Modification of Briefing Schedule re 55 MOTION to Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint. Responses due by 8/26/2015. Replies due by 9/16/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/27/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
54
STIPULATION AND ORDER revising briefing deadlines re: 51 MOTION to Change Venue. Response due by 7/29/2015. Reply due by 8/12/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/02/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ON STATE OF CALIFORNIA'S NOTICE OF ELECTION TO DECLINE INTERVENTION re 43 Notice filed by State of California. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/20/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
