Montoya v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
| Marlon Montoya |
| Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company and The RSL Group and Blanket Trust |
| 4:2014cv02740 |
| June 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES by Hon. William H. Orrick granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion for Attorney Fees. Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order plaintiff and defendant shall submit a joint proposed judgment on the motion for attorney's fees that excludes the counsel and paralegal time identified in this order and uses the appropriate rates for work through and post May 2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/15/2017)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER EXTENDING TIME granting 116 STIPULATION- Reply in support of 109 MOTION for Attorney Fees due by 5/3/2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/03/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 110 STIPULATION to continue briefing deadlines and hearing re 109 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Response due by 4/24/2017. Reply due by 5/1/2017. Motion Hearing set for 5/17/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/17/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)
|
|
Filing
103
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/02/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ON DISPUTES RE FINAL JUDGMENT. The parties shall submit an agreed-to form of judgment no later than January 6, 2017. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/19/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge William H. Orrick granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment by Montoya; denying 64 Motion for Summary Judgment by Reliance. Within 20 days of the date of this Order, Montoya and Reliance shal l meet and confer on a proposed form of judgment. If the parties cannot agree on the form that judgment should take, they shall file briefs (not to exceed 10 pages each) justifying their competing proposals. The briefs shall be filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 68 Stipulation extending deadlines. Responses due by 1/5/2016. Replies due by 1/19/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/4/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 66 STIPULATION as to 53 , 64 Motions for Summary Judgment.Responses due by 1/4/2016. Replies due by 1/18/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 49 STIPULATION to Extend Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date. Motion Hearing set for 2/3/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/19/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 31 Supplemental Brief. Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of review and response to an IME report before a final decision on administrative appeal is DENIED based on the record before the Court Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/10/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
35
Order by Hon. William H. Orrick denying 24 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The parties shall proceed with the physical IME and that IME shall be conducted within 60 days of the date of this Order. In supplemental briefing submitted after t he oral argument, the parties raised the new issue of whether Montoya is entitled under ERISA to review the findings of an IME before a final decision on administrative appeal is rendered by Reliance. That issue will be addressed in a separate order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
