Bohnert v. The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco et al
Plaintiff: Kimberly Bohnert
Defendant: The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco, The Archdiocese Of San Francisco Parish, School And Cemetery Juridic Persons Capital Assets Support Corporation, The Archdiocese Of San Francisco Parish And School Juridic Persons Real Property Support Corporation, The Archdiocese of San Francisco and Junipero Serra High School
Case Number: 3:2014cv02854
Filed: June 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: William H. Orrick
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/19/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015)
October 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER SCHEDULING MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/01/2015.(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2015)
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 158 Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting in part and denying in part 89 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to dismiss the FEHA claims against Serra and DENIED in all other respects. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2015)
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER by Judge Orrick granting 72 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; resolving 73 discovery dispute regarding scope of examination. (wholc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2015)
May 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE ABOUT NUMBER AND SCHEDULING OF DEPOSITIONS re 61 , 63 , 64 and 65 Discovery Letters. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/22/2015. Within the next week, the parties shall file a stipulation extending t he expert discovery deadlines to allow the non-expert depositions to be completed sufficiently in advance of the revised expert disclosure date. Expert discovery must be completed in advance of the settlement conference. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2015)
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER re 61 Discovery Letter Brief. If the parties are unable to resolve this dispute on their own, plaintiff should provide me, by May 15, 2015, with a list of the witnesses it is deposing and would like to depose and for each witness, a very b rief description of the expected areas of testimony, the expected length of testimony (full day, half day, or less), and the agreed-upon dates of deposition (if any). Defendant may respond by May 20, 2015 to explain why the testimony would be cumulative or unnecessary. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/08/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2015)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE REGARDING DEPOSITION SCHEDULING re 59 Letter. The parties should continue to meet and confer to schedule the remaining depositions at issue. The depositions should be scheduled by April 17, 2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/09/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2015)
November 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES; GRANTING 48 MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Hon. William H. Orrick. Records dating back to 2004 are sufficient in this case. Once those records are reviewed, defendant can renew its request for earlier records if the reviewed records demonstrate that earlier records are material. Given the sensitive nature of the documents at issue, the "first look" procedure proposed by plaintiff is appropriate and shall be employed. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS re 38 Stipulation. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/03/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2014)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' 7 MOTION TO DISMISS by Hon. William H. Orrick. Defendants' requests for judicial notice ( 9 , 26 ) are GRANTED. Bohnert's first and third causes of action (violations of FEHA) against the Archdiocese of San Francisco, the Archbishop Corporation, the Real Property Corporation, and the Capital Assets Corporation are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Bohnert's first and third causes of action against Serra are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Defendants' motion to dismiss the fifth and sixth causes of action (infliction of emotional distress) is DENIED. Any amended complaint shall be filed within 30 days of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2014)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/27/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bohnert v. The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco
Represented By: Michelle R. Barrett
Represented By: Lisa Lin Garcia
Represented By: George Joseph Tichy, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Archdiocese Of San Francisco Parish, School And Cemetery Juridic Persons Capital Assets Support Corporation
Represented By: Michelle R. Barrett
Represented By: Lisa Lin Garcia
Represented By: George Joseph Tichy, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Archdiocese Of San Francisco Parish And School Juridic Persons Real Property Support Corporation
Represented By: Michelle R. Barrett
Represented By: Lisa Lin Garcia
Represented By: George Joseph Tichy, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Archdiocese of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Junipero Serra High School
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Bohnert
Represented By: Deborah Marie Kochan
Represented By: Mathew Nimrod Stephenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?