Ronpak, Inc. v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronpak, Inc.
Defendant: Electronics For Imaging, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv04058
Filed: September 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Jon S. Tigar
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 38 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ronpak, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2015)
February 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 5/2/2016 - 5/17/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)
January 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 2/5/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/18/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 14, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2015)
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 22, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2014)
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Request for Order Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Ronpak, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/7/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/21/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2014)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Request for Order Continuing Hearing Date for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Ronpak, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 2, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2014)
November 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 19 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation filed by Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 21, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2014)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/10/14. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronpak, Inc. v. Electronics For Imaging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronpak, Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth E. Keller
Represented By: Garth Aaron Rosengren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Electronics For Imaging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?