Borja-Valdes et al v. City and County of San Francisco
| Ana Borja-Valdes, Lillie Ellison and Mercedes Hernandez-Monroy |
| City and County of San Francisco |
| 3:2014cv04168 |
| September 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER OF DISMISSAL (90 days conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/18/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
55
Judgment by Judge Charles R. Breyer. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 29 Motion to Dismiss (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER, Reset Hearing as to 29 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT., granting 36 STIPULATION re 29 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT To Continue Hearing Date filed by Ana Borja-Valdes, et al. Motion Hearing reset for 5/22/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/20/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
