Stephen v. Chappell
Petitioner: Jimmie Earl Stephen
Respondent: K. Chappell
Case Number: 3:2014cv04927
Filed: November 5, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: PSLC CET
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/18/2015)
February 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 7 10 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/27/2015)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 5 2 3 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/12/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephen v. Chappell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmie Earl Stephen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Chappell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?