Panacci v. A1 Solar Power, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Tom Panacci
Defendant: A1 Solar Power, Inc. and National Renewable Energy Center
Case Number: 3:2015cv00532
Filed: February 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER GRANTING re 56 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Tom Panacci. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/29/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
October 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 49 SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES 5:14-cv-02702 NC and 3:15-cv-00532 JCS. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/9/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER GRANTING re 44 Letter filed by National Renewable Energy Center, A1 Solar Power, Inc. for Henry Nicholls to appear by phone on 10/2/15 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/22/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2015)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING re 40 Letter filed by Tom Panacci for Charles D. Marshall to appear by phone on 9/4/15 at 2:00 PM. Signed, as modified, by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/20/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2015)
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 AMENDED ORDER (adding only date of order) granting in part and denying in part 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by National Renewable Energy Center, A1 Solar Power, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/15/15. (jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING re 27 Letter filed by National Renewable Energy Center, A1 Solar Power, Inc., for Jeffrey M. Cohon to appear by phone on 6/12/15 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/11/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2015)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING re 9 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by National Renewable Energy Center, A1 Solar Power, Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/24/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Panacci v. A1 Solar Power, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tom Panacci
Represented By: Charles David Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A1 Solar Power, Inc.
Represented By: David Robert Socher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Renewable Energy Center
Represented By: David Robert Socher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?