e.Digital Corporation v. ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: e.Digital Corporation
Defendant: ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd., Ivideon LLC, Global Innovations, Inc. and New Sight Devices Corp.
Case Number: 3:2015cv00691
Filed: February 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: William H. Orrick
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 89 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 88 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 17, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017)
December 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Deadline for Defendants' Invalidity Contentions filed by New Sight Devices Corp., Ivideon LLC, Global Innovations. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 13, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)
September 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE ENRTY OF DEFAULT by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying as moot 48 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 54 Motion to Vacate. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2016)
August 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 54 MOTION to Vacate Entry of Default Judgment filed by New Sight Devices Corp., Ivideon LLC, Global Innovations. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 8, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2016)
March 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER STAYING CASE IN PART AND DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying 34 Motion for Default Judgment. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/9/2016. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 24, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 12/22/2015. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 8, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2015)
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2015)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 31 Ex Parte Application Plaintiff e.Digitals Unopposed Notice Of Ex Parte And Ex Parte Request That The Court Take The Case Management Conference Set For July 29, 2015 Off Calendar filed by e.Digital Corporation. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 17, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MINUTE ORDER NOTING DISMISSAL re 30 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 10, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2015)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER REGARDING REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 24 Plaintiff e.Digital Corporations Notice Of Inability To File Case Management Statement Prior To The June 24, 2015 Case Management Conference And Request That The Hearing Be Cont inued For Two Weeks filed by e.Digital Corporation. Case Management Statement due by 7/15/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/29/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 17, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: e.Digital Corporation v. ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: e.Digital Corporation
Represented By: Pamela C. Chalk
Represented By: Anton N Handal
Represented By: Gabriel Hedrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ShenZhen Gospell Smarthome Electronic Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ivideon LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Global Innovations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Sight Devices Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?