Ostrowski v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
Andrew Ostrowski and Mark Roushion |
NVIDIA Corporation and Gigabyte Global Business Corporation |
Pedro Santiago |
4:2015cv00760 |
February 19, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Charles R. Breyer |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 ORDER re 124 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER, VACATING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANTS' 114 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 06/14/2016. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2016) |
Filing 111 Amended order re status conference statement. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/23/2015. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015) |
Filing 110 ORDER re status conference statement. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 12/21/2015. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015) |
Filing 87 ORDER granting 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 77 Clerk's Notice, For Order Changing Date of Case Management Conference & Other Pre-Trial Deadlines filed by Paolo Jimenez, et al. Case Management Statement due by 11/17/2015. Case Management Conference reset for 11/20/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/4/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2015) |
Filing 83 SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES 5:15-cv-03428 NC, Dye v Nvidia and 3:15-cv-00760 CRB, In Re: Nvidia GTX 970 Graphics Chip Litigation. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/31/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015) |
Filing 82 ORDER granting 80 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File second Amended Consolidated Complaint and to Take Hearing on Motion to Dismiss Off Calendar filed by Timothy Farley, Paolo Jimenez, David Dropski, Stephen Denz, Ryan Brenek, Jason Doerrer, Joel Bernabel, Kyle Ellis. Second Amended Consolidated Complaint due by 9/14/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/31/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015) |
Filing 72 ORDER granting 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 67 Amended Complaint, filed by NVIDIA Corporation, Gigabyte Global Business Corporation, ASUS Computer International. Responses to any Rule 12 motions due by 8/14/2015. Replies due by 9/4/2015. Motion Hearing set for 9/18/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/1/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015) |
Filing 58 CORRECTED ORDER re 52 STIPULATION re 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines filed by Andrew Ostrowski Case Management Statement due by 7/10/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/17/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/23/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2015) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 40 STIPULATION to set Schedule for Applications for Appointment of Interim Class Counsel and Extend Deadline to file Consolidated Amended Complaint filed by Stephen Denz. Reset Deadlines as to 29 MOTION to Appoi nt Counsel . Motions to appoint interim counsel due by 4/10/2015.Responses due by 4/24/2015. Motion Hearing set for 5/8/2015 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/10/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.