Godoy et al v. County of Sonoma, et al
| Jose Luis Godoy, L.M., K.A. and J.C. |
| County of Sonoma and City of Santa Rosa |
| 4:2015cv00883 |
| February 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sonoma |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
Order by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 118 Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs. The Court declines to award costs in this case. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/22/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER REGARDING EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN OPPOSITION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/28/2016. If plaintiffs intend to authenticate any documents to which defendants have objected, they should do so by July 1, 2016. Defendants may file any further evidentiary objections by July 5, 2016.(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT ENE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/4/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting 70 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Jose Luis Godoy. Case Management Statement due by 2/16/2016. Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/02/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER REGARDING 56 , 58 , 59 MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick. For the reasons described above, defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, except with respect to the First Cause of Action as to Lupton and the Second Cause of Action as to Pederson. At oral argument, plaintiffs asserted they could add pertinent allegations to strengthen their complaint. Any amended complaint should be filed within 20 days of this Order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2016)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING 32 MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Hon. William H. Orrick. Any amended complaint must be filed within 90 days of this order. During that time, the parties should proceed with discovery to enable plaintiffs to determine what role, if any, the Santa Rosa defendants played in the alleged conduct.(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
|
|
Filing
53
CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/12/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2015)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge William H. Orrick granting 21 and 22 Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Any amended complaint must be filed within 20 days of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
9
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 3 Motion to Appoint Deanna Boyd ad Litem..(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
