Cheetah Mobile, Inc. et al v. APUS Group
| Cheetah Mobile, Inc., Cheetah Mobile America, Inc. and Cheetah Technology Corporation Limited |
| APUS Group |
| 3:2015cv02363 |
| May 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Outside US |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 63 Motion to Serve by Alternative Means and to Extend Service Deadline; and DENYING 66 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Issued by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/28/2016. (hsglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 64 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule and Hearing Date. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2016)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING QUASHING SERVICE AND GRANTING 56 STIPULATION RE 29 . (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 22 STIPULATION TO FILE EXCESS PAGES AND EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING 17 MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR BIFURCATED BRIEFING OF RULE 12(B) MOTION (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
