Workman v. Plum, Inc., et al
| Kathryn Workman |
| Plum Inc. and Campbell Soup Company |
| 3:2015cv02568 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 11/2/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
40
NOTICE RE OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUNG ATTORNEYS. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/16/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER GRANTING 33 STIPULATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER GRANTING 27 STIPULATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING 25 STIPULATION SETTING DEFENDANTS RESPONSE DATE TOTHE COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2015)
|
|
Filing
24
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 23 Clerk's Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING 14 21 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR A LIMITED STAY PENDING EARLY MEDIATION (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
20
NOTICE REGARDING FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY PROPOSED CLASS SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 7/14/2015. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
