Ramirez v. 101 Smith Ranch Road Strip Mall et al

Plaintiff: Irma Ramirez
Defendant: 101 Smith Ranch Road Strip Mall, 111 Partners, a California General Partnership, Roger Smith, Michael Smith and Daniel Ross
Case Number: 3:2015cv02578
Filed: June 10, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 3, 2016 17 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/3/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2016)
November 17, 2015 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This is an ADA case that is subject to the case-management deadlines set forth in this districts General Order 56. The plaintiff filed a complaint on June 10, 2015. (ECF No. 1.) The last day to hold a joint site inspection was September 23, 2015, and the deadline to file a notice of need for mediation was 42 days later on November 4, 2015. (ECF No. 3.) No notice was filed. Another issue is that 111 Partners and two individuals (Roger Smith and Michael Smith) answered the complaint and denied that Daniel Ross was an owner or had an ownership interest. (ECF No. 7.) Under the circumstances, the court orders the parties to file a short joint update by November 25, 2015 about 1) whether Daniel Ross should be dismissed or if not, what other action the plaintiff intends to take, and 2) whether the parties request any change in the scheduling order at ECF No. 3. To avoid losing track of the case, the court sets it for a status hearing on December 3, 2015, at 11:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/17/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez v. 101 Smith Ranch Road Strip Mall et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irma Ramirez
Represented By: Thomas E. Frankovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 101 Smith Ranch Road Strip Mall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 111 Partners, a California General Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?