McBride v. Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc. et al
| Frank A McBride, III |
| Pentagon Technologies Group, Inc., Baird Capital Partners Management Company III LLC, BCP III Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Baird Capital Partners III Limited Partnership and BCP III Special Affiliates Limited Partnership |
| 3:2015cv02696 |
| June 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER GRANTING 67 STIPULATION to Extend Deadlines. Discovery due by 9/30/2016. Expert Discovery due by 11/11/2016. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 6/17/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2016)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 63 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 4/21/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/25/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER FOR PRETRIAL PREPARATION. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 1/28/16. (jebS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong denying 4 and 9 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
