Craig McDonald v. The Ritz Carlton San Francisco et al
Plaintiff: Craig McDonald
Defendant: Marriott International, The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., LLC, Dometic Sales Corporation and Dometic Corporation
Case Number: 3:2015cv02754
Filed: June 18, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 102 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/8/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019)
June 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 90 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 89 RESETTING CASE DEADLINES AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Jury Selection/Trial set for 4/8/2019 at 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 3/21/2019 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/18/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2018)
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 65 STIPULATION AND ORDER Resetting Case Deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/2/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2017)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER 37 Granting Leave to Plaintiff to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/3/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Craig McDonald v. The Ritz Carlton San Francisco et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig McDonald
Represented By: Phong-Chau Gia Nguyen
Represented By: Fabrice Nijhof Vincent
Represented By: Todd Alan Walburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marriott International
Represented By: Matthew Stanley Conant
Represented By: Maria M Lampasona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., LLC
Represented By: Matthew Stanley Conant
Represented By: Maria M Lampasona
Represented By: Alexei Nathan Offill-Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dometic Sales Corporation
Represented By: Leah Brooke Mason
Represented By: Krsto Mijanovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dometic Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?