G. et al v. Loral Space & Communications et al
| Richard G., Suzanne G. and Lisa G. |
| Space Systems/Loral |
| 3:2015cv02807 |
| June 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER dismissal with prejudice filed by Lisa G., Richard G., Suzanne G. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/30/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
62
NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2015 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 9/14/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2015)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER re Summary Judgment Briefing and Hearing. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/26/2015. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015)
|
|
Filing
51
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 Stipulation to Change the Date of the Initial Case Managment Conference; [Proposed] Order filed by Space Systems/Loral Case Management Statement due by 8/20/2015. Case Management Conference set for 8/27/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
