ASM Investment LLC v. Esparaza

Plaintiff: ASM Investment LLC
Defendant: Francisco Esparaza
Case Number: 3:2015cv03134
Filed: July 7, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: William H. Orrick
Nature of Suit: Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1442
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 24, 2015 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 3 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN IFP; ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE. The case shall be REMANDED to Contra Costa County Superior Court. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/24/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASM Investment LLC v. Esparaza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Francisco Esparaza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASM Investment LLC
Represented By: Alexander Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?