Swipe & Bite, Inc. v. Chow et al
Plaintiff: Swipe & Bite, Inc.
Defendant: William Chow, Christopher Trinh, Shuk Chow and Alice Chow
Case Number: 5:2015cv03997
Filed: September 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Jon S. Tigar
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MINUTE ORDER NOTING STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL re 53 STIPULATED JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 14, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2016)
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING DATES filed by William Chow. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2016)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING re 32 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION FOR IMM EDIATE, INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL filed by Swipe & Bite, Inc. Responses due by 12/21/2015. Replies due by 12/28/2015. Motion Hearing set for 1/14/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 8, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2015)
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT TRINHS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss; denying 16 Motion to Remand. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swipe & Bite, Inc. v. Chow et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Swipe & Bite, Inc.
Represented By: Jack Russo
Represented By: Christopher Joseph Sargent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Chow
Represented By: Jason R. Bartlett
Represented By: Sherman W. Kahn
Represented By: Marc J. Pernick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Trinh
Represented By: David Alan Makman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shuk Chow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alice Chow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?