Johnson v. Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. et al
| Breana Johnson |
| Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc., Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC and Sears Outlet Stores, LLC |
| 4:2015cv04026 |
| September 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO DISMISS LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE filed by Breana Johnson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2016)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 27 Joint Case Management Statement filed by SEARS HOMETOWN AND OUTLET STORES, INC., Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc., Sears Outlet Stores, LLC, Sears Authorized Hometown Stores, LLC. Case Management Statement due by 4/26/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/10/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 13, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2016)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO ARBITRATE CLAIM AND STAY PROCEEDINGS filed by Breana Johnson. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 5, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
