Buckhorn et al v. Hettinger
Plaintiff: Jack Buckhorn and Anisa M. Thomsen
Defendant: Marion Eugene Hettinger
Case Number: 3:2015cv04352
Filed: September 23, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth D. Laporte
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 235 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 218 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 186 Motion to Dismiss; denying 188 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; finding as moot 196 Motion to Appear by Telephone; finding as moot 197 Motion to Appear by Telephone. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2020)
July 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 179 Motion for Leave to Amend. Third Amended Complaint due by 7/24/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
April 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 162 WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $123,833.54 (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2019)
January 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 104 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2019)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER for Supplemental Filing re 104 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs Complaint filed by Jack Buckhorn, Fregoso Builders, Inc, Redwood Empire Vacation, Anisa M. Thomsen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 09/19/2018. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018)
June 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER continuing case management conference to 8/23/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2016)
April 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 20 Status Report filed by Jack Buckhorn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/12/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2016)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference to 4/19/2016 at 10:00 AM by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Buckhorn et al v. Hettinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Buckhorn
Represented By: Sue Campbell
Represented By: Matthew Parsa Minser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anisa M. Thomsen
Represented By: Sue Campbell
Represented By: Matthew Parsa Minser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marion Eugene Hettinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?