Lopez v. Sysco Corporation et al
| Cosmo Lopez |
| Sysco San Francisco, Inc. and Sysco Corporation |
| 4:2015cv04420 |
| September 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jeffrey S White |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Receipt Acknowledging Transmission of Certified Copy of Docket Entries and Certified Copy of Remand Order, from Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016) |
| Filing 26 Certified copy of docket entries and certified copy of Remand Order transmitted to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. Counsel notified. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016) |
Filing 25
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting #17 Motion to Remand; denying as moot #7 Motion to Dismiss (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)
|
| Filing 24 Supplemental REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand), filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Madoyan, Vartan) (Filed on 1/15/2016) Modified on 1/19/2016 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 23 Response to Supplemental Brief (re #17 MOTION to Remand, #7 MOTION to Dismiss) filed by Cosmo Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Mara, David) (Filed on 1/8/2016) Modified on 1/11/2016 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Electronic filing error. Document not properly linked. [err102] Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary re #22 Supplemental Brief filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. ***FOR FUTURE FILINGS DOCUMENTS MUST BE LINKED TO MOTIONS THEY SUPPORT/OPPOSE*** (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015) |
| Filing 22 Supplemental Brief in Support of #7 Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to #17 Motion to Remand filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Madoyan, Vartan) (Filed on 12/18/2015) Modified on 12/21/2015 (kcS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 21
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING; REQUIRING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING as to #17 MOTION to Remand, #7 MOTION to Dismiss; AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Opening brief due by 12/18/2015. Responses due by 1/8/2016. Replies due by 1/15/2016. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/7/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY (re #17 MOTION to Remand ) to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Order Remanding the Case to State Court filed byCosmo Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Mara, David) (Filed on 11/16/2015) |
| Electronic filing error - Cases assigned to Judge Jeffrey S. White should bear the initials "JSW" following the case number Re: #19 Reply to Opposition, filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. Counsel need not re-file document, but should reference "JSW" after the case number for future filings. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015) |
| Filing 19 Memorandum in Opposition re #17 Motion to Remand, filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Madoyan, Vartan) (Filed on 11/9/2015) Modified on 11/10/2015 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 18 Proposed Order re #17 MOTION to Remand by Cosmo Lopez. (Mara, David) (Filed on 10/26/2015) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Remand filed by Cosmo Lopez. Motion Hearing set for 12/11/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Responses due by 11/9/2015. Replies due by 11/16/2015. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Of David Mara, Esq., #3 Judicial notice part one, #4 Judicial notice part Two, #5 Judicial notice part Three, #6 Judicial notice part Four, #7 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Mara, David) (Filed on 10/26/2015) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #7 Motion to Dismiss. Motion Hearing set for 12/11/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White, per #15 Renotice of Motion. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2015) |
| Filing 16 REPLY (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed bySysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Madoyan, Vartan) (Filed on 10/23/2015) |
| Filing 15 Renotice motion hearing re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Amended filed bySysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Madoyan, Vartan) (Filed on 10/23/2015) |
| Filing 14 COUNSEL HAS BEEN NOTIFIED TO RENOTICE THIS MOTION AGAIN. COUNSEL SHALL FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS FOR NOTICING A MOTION BEFORE JUDGE WHITE. Only the hearing date will change the briefing schedule remains as originally set as to:Renotice motion hearing re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed bySysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Related document(s) #7 ) (Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 10/19/2015) Modified on 10/20/2015 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE (re #7 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byCosmo Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Ray Padilla, Esq., #2 Exhibit A to Ray Padiila's Declaration, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sanchez, Reinel) (Filed on 10/16/2015) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT: Case Management Statement due by 12/30/2015. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/8/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2015)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hon. Jeffrey S. White for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/8/15. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2015)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2015) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Cosmo Lopez.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Sanchez, Reinel) (Filed on 10/6/2015) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff Cosmo Lopez and Defendants Sysco Corporation and Sysco San Francisco, Inc. shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by October 9, 2015. The consent/declination forms are attached to this Notice and are also located on the Court's home page, www.cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2015) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/10/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Responses due by 10/16/2015. Replies due by 10/23/2015. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss)(Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 10/2/2015) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. re #3 Notice of Removal, #5 Scheduling Order, documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2 and pursuant to Court's Order (Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 9/28/2015) Modified on 9/29/2015 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/22/2015. Case Management Conference set for 12/29/2015 10:00 AM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2015) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2015) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL; No Process with Jury Demand, from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG15782744. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-9867919). Filed by Sysco San Francisco, Inc., Sysco Corporation. (Attachments: #1 *** Copy of Complaint attached. *** - Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 9/25/2015) Modified on 9/28/2015 (sv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/28/2015 (mclS, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/9/2015 (jlmS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Sysco Holdings, LLC for Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 9/25/2015) |
| Filing 1 Declaration of Brett Appleberg in Support of Notice of Removal filed bySysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Shadi, Sabrina Layne) (Filed on 9/25/2015) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
