Rezvan v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation
| Layla Rezvan |
| Philips Electronics North America Corporation |
| 3:2015cv04767 |
| October 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2016)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 94 PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO BRING VIDEO EQUIPMENT INTO COURT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2016)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS 40 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 88 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Leishman, David. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 55 Administrative Motion to submit newly released judicial opinion re 50 Opposition/Response to Motion. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
37
Notice of discovery procedures. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/11/2016. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 31 Stipulated Protective Order for Standard Litigation (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2016)
|
|
Filing
29
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/19/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2016)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 23 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 17 Stipulation Selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/30/15. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rezvan v. Philips Electronics North America Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Layla Rezvan | |
| Represented By: | Charles Jerome Wisch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Philips Electronics North America Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Anthony Killens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
