Autobahn Motors v. Maskay Inc. et. al.
| Authobahn Motors, Inc |
| Maskay Corporation, Eurotech and Michael Keynejad |
| 4:2015cv04803 |
| October 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 19 Motion to Remand. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER VACATING HEARING re 19 MOTION to Remand filed by Authobahn Motors, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 19, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER VACATING HEARINGS re 7 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MOTION AND SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE [CCP 425.16 ANTI-SLAPP] AND FOR ATTORNEYS FEES filed by Maskay Corporation, Eurotech, Michael Keynejad; 8 MOTION to Dismiss PER FRCP RULE 12(B)(1) AND FRCP RULE 12 (B)(6) filed by Maskay Corporation, Eurotech, Michael Keynejad. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 27, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING DATES FOR FILING OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES filed by Authobahn Motors, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 26, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
