Natalie Sramek v. California Highway Patrol et al
| Natalie Sramek |
| California Highway Patrol, Joseph Farrow, Sean Harrington and Robert Hazelwood |
| 4:2015cv04873 |
| October 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Stipulation OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Re Docket No. 16 Granting Request to Vacate CMC. Joint Status Report due by 9/23/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/9/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2016)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO RESPOND Status Report due by 6/6/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/3/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2016)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 9 Stipulated Request to Continue CMC. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
6
SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 15, 2016. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 4 Stipulation Moving Initial CMC. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
