Vakili v. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Tanyer Vakili |
| Department of Homeland Security and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 4:2015cv04894 |
| October 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Kandis A. Westmore |
| Naturalization Application |
| Application for Naturalization |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/28/2016. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/14/2016. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER, granting: 20 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and [Proposed] Order filed by Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Updated Case Management Statement due by 8/26/2016. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/2/2016 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/6/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER RE FILING FEES AND IFP APPLICATION by Judge Charles R. Breyer. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Charles R. Breyer. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
