Tech 21 UK Limited et al v. Spigen Inc.
| Tech 21 UK Limited and Tech 21 Licensing Limited |
| Spigen Inc. |
| 3:2015cv05059 |
| November 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 9/8/2016 at 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 9/2/2016. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/10/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2016)
|
|
Filing
44
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER, Case referred to mediation. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/15/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection/Trial set for 10/2/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Flo or, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/9/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2016)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING SPIGEN, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Case Management Conference set for 5/5/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/2/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
