McGrane et al v. Cathay Bank

Plaintiff: William N. McGrane and Sherrill A. McGrane
Defendant: Cathay Bank
Case Number: 3:2015cv05090
Filed: November 5, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15:1601
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGrane et al v. Cathay Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William N. McGrane
Represented By: Howard M. Garfield
Represented By: Gavin Harry McGrane
Represented By: Matthew Jeffrey Shier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherrill A. McGrane
Represented By: Howard M. Garfield
Represented By: Gavin Harry McGrane
Represented By: Matthew Jeffrey Shier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cathay Bank
Represented By: Christian Edward Baker
Represented By: Carl Lewis Grumer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?