Rankin v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Trisha Marie Rankin
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv05170
Filed: November 11, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 31, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Payment of Attorney Fees filed by Trisha Marie Rankin, Nancy A. Berryhill. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/31/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rankin v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trisha Marie Rankin
Represented By: Brian Anthony Barboza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Chantal Renee Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?