Elizabeth Maderal v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Elizabeth Maderal |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and RTS Pacific, Inc. |
| 3:2015cv05214 |
| November 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Maxine M. Chesney |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 25, 2016. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS; DISMISSING COMPLAINT; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND; VACATING HEARING. The complaint is dismissed. If plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint no later than January 22, 2016. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF MOTION TO DISMISS AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 7, 2015. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/17/15. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
