Pradeep et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited
| A.K. Pradeep, Ratnakar Dev, Thomas Robbins and Moodcast, Inc. |
| Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited |
| 3:2015cv05229 |
| November 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER of Dismissal filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on May 17, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2016)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Hearing Date for Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited. Motion Hearing sreet for 6/23/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/11/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, 17 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Ratnakar Dev, Moodcast, Inc., A.K. Pradeep, Thomas Robbins filed by Moodcast, Inc., Thomas Robbins, Ratnakar Dev, A.K. Pradeep. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
