Li v. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
| Kang Li |
| KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Martin Shkreli |
| 3:2015cv05841 |
| December 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| San Francisco |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER Granting 61 Defendant Martin Shkreli's Motion to Dismiss. All claims are dismissed with leave to amend. Any amended complaint must be filed on or before 7/21/2017. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 6/23/2017. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2017)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference scheduled for April 28, 2016, in Isensee v. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. 5:15-cv-06331-EJD, is VACATED. The Case Management Conference in the above-entitled ac tion (5:15-cv-05841-EJD) is CONTINUED from April 28, 2016, to 9:00 a.m. June 2, 2016. The parties shall file an updated Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before May 26, 2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/28/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING 7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice filed by Kang Li as to Defendant Herb C. Cross. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/22/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
