Kensington Apartment Properties, LLC et al v. Loanvest IX, L.P.

Appellant: Kensington Apartment Properties, LLC
Appellee: Loanvest IX, L.P.
Case Number: 3:2015cv06286
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 14, 2016 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/28/2016. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kensington Apartment Properties, LLC et al v. Loanvest IX, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Kensington Apartment Properties, LLC
Represented By: Jeremy W. Katz
Represented By: Matthew Jeffrey Shier
Represented By: Linda Louise Sorensen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Loanvest IX, L.P.
Represented By: Kevin Richard Brodehl
Represented By: Stephen D. Finestone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?