Nilsen v. Paramo
Petitioner: Vance Nilsen
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Case Number: 3:2016cv00865
Filed: February 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 6/6/2016. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 4/5/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)
March 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 4/1/2016. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/15/2016. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nilsen v. Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vance Nilsen
Represented By: Richard B. Mazer
Represented By: Charles A. Murray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Paramo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?