Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Altera Corporation
Plaintiff: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Defendant: Altera Corporation
Case Number: 3:2016cv00926
Filed: February 25, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Altera Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG
Represented By: Andrew G. DiNovo
Represented By: Jay D Ellwanger
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Nicole E. Glauser
Represented By: Daniel L. Schmid
Represented By: William Paul Schuck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altera Corporation
Represented By: Jonathan D. Allred
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Chad S. Campbell
Represented By: Nancy Cheng
Represented By: Jared Willis Crop
Represented By: Jessica Lee Everett-Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?