Mission Trading Company, Inc. v. Lewis et al
Mission Trading Company, Inc. |
David Vincent Lewis and Sandra Gallagher Lewis |
4:2016cv01110 |
March 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Kandis A. Westmore |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting 42 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2016) |
Filing 47 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 14 Motion to Strike. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2016) |
Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 29 Motion to Set Aside Default. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2016) |
Filing 32 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 29 First MOTION to Set Aside Default (Dkt. 25) filed by David Vincent Lewis. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 25, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2016) |
Filing 27 ORDER VACATING HEARING re 14 MOTION to Strike 8 Answer to Complaint Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaim, Causes of Action & Prayer MOTION to Dismiss Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaim, Causes of Action & Prayer MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Mission Trading Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 20, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.