PersonalWeb Technologies LLC et al v. International Business Machines Corporation
| PersonalWeb Technologies LLC and Level 3 Communications LLC |
| International Business Machines Corporation |
| David Folsom |
| Github Inc. |
| David Keyzer |
| 3:2016cv01266 |
| March 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
379
UNSEALED ORDER DENYING 364 IBM'S RENEWED MOTION TO EXCLUDE/STRIKE THE OPINIONS OF DR. MICHAEL AKEMANN. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/7/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2017)
|
|
Filing
369
OMNIBUS ORDER REGARDING 365 367 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/7/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017)
|
|
Filing
355
ORDER DENYING 353 IBM'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF JULY 28, 2017, OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO RE-SET SECHEDULES, AND FOR CONTINUED TRIAL DATE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/31/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
352
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/28/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2017)
|
|
Filing
347
OMNIBUS ORDER REGARDING 273 286 287 289 309 316 319 322 324 325 334 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/27/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2017)
|
|
Filing
345
SECOND ORDER REGARDING 269 279 285 313 MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/26/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)
|
|
Filing
343
FIRST ORDER REGARDING 255 270 271 275 278 280 281 282 283 284 288 317 MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/25/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2017)
|
|
Filing
253
ORDER DENYING 250 IBM'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ON PERSONALWEB'S INDIRECT INFRINGEMENT THEORIES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/31/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2017)
|
|
Filing
249
REDACTED ORDER DENYING 212 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 218 DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/9/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2017)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER GRANTING 233 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/9/2017. (patentlcsjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2017)
|
|
Filing
210
PRETRIAL ORDER(JURY) - SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFIC DEADLINES: The Trial Setting Conference scheduled for 2/23/2017 is VACATED - NO APPEARANCE NECESSARY and the parties are ordered to comply with the schedule set forth in the order. Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement due by 7/6/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/20/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Selection set for 8/8/2017 09:00 AM, Jury Trial set for 8/8/2017 01:30 PM. Jury Trial dates:8/9, 8/11, 8/15, 8/16, 8/18/2017. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/13/2017. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2017) Modified text on 2/14/2017 (amkS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
163
ORDER denying 128 Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination; denying 161 Administrative Motion for Continuance of the Hearing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/9/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
