Brian B. Sand & Zachary B. Sand Joint Trust v. Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P. et al
| Brian B. Sand & Zachary B. Sand Joint Trust |
| Biotechnology Value Fund, L.P., Biotechnology Value Fund II, L.P., Investment 10, L.L.C., MSI BVF Inc., BVF Partners, L.P., BVF Inc., Mark N. Lampert and Oncothyreon, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv01313 |
| March 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting in part with prejudice and denying in part 68 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2017)
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 to Modify Time to Respond to Amended Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/4/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2017)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 31 Motion to Dismiss, with leave to amend.(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2017)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference and Enlarge Time to File Case Management Statement. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/28/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/28/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
