Gaddy v. Townsend et al
| Michael John Gaddy |
| M. Townsend, M. Voong and Sandoval |
| 3:2016cv01319 |
| March 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Sacramento |
| PSLC MSH |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/29/2019. (hsglc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2019)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (hsglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2019)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER REOPENING CASE AND VACATING JUDGMENT; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Replies due by 7/6/2018 and Responses due by 6/11/2018. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/13/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2018)
|
|
Filing
35
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/16/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2017)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS 10 MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER OF SERVICE Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 9/12/2016. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/14/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
