Forreststream Holdings Limited v. Shenkman
Plaintiff: Forreststream Holdings Limited
Defendant: Gregory Shenkman
Case Number: 3:2016cv01609
Filed: March 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 431 WRIT of Execution issued against Gregory Shenkman (aka Grigory Shenkman) in the amount of $4,761,418.98 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2023)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 427 WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $4,992,747.39 (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021)
March 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 395 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 364 Motion to Withdraw ; granting 366 Motion to Withdraw. As set forth in the attached order, the court grants Walter C. Cook's motion to withdraw as attorney for Gregory Shenkman. (Until Mr. Shenk man enters an appearance, Mr. Cook must accept service of all papers from Forreststream and the court and must forward them to Mr. Shenkman.) (Attachments: # 1 Pro Se Handbook, # 2 Legal Help Center Flyer) (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2019)
March 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 385 ORDER TO MR. SHENKMAN TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONED FOR VIOLATION OF 357 ORDER ("Turnover Order") AND 378 ORDER ("Compliance Order")As set forth in the attached, the court orders M r. Shenkman to personally appear before the court on March 7, 2019, at 9:30 a.m., and show cause why he should not be held in contempt and sanctioned for (1) not producing the declaration regarding his watches required by the Compliance Order, (2) no t producing the declaration regarding his efforts to obtain financial-account statements required by the Compliance Order, and (3) causing disbursements from the GS&Co. account for personal purposes in violation of the Turnover Order.If Mr. She nkman wants to file any written response to Forreststream's notice, he must do so by March 5, 2019. Forreststream may then file any written reply by March 6, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/7/2019 09:30 AM. Show Cause Response due by 3/5/2019. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on March 3, 2019. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2019)
February 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 377 ORDER GRANTING 353 Forreststream's Motion to Determine Claim of Exemption and DENYING Mr. Shenkman's Claim of Exemption.As set forth in the attached order, the court grants Forreststream's motion for a determination on Mr. Shenkman's claim of exemption and denies Mr. Shenkman's claim. The court further authorizes the U.S. Marshal to proceed with the sale of that certain 2011 Audi A8L in the Marshal's custody, immediately and not subject to any exemp tion. The court revises its earlier turnover order, ECF No. 357 , with respect to requiring Mr. Shenkman to cause GS&Co. to turn over $19,000 to Forreststream and orders instead that Mr. Shenkman cause GS&Co. to turn over $15,950 to Forreststream. The rest of the turnover order, ECF No. 357 , remains in effect. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on February 11, 2019. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2019)
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 349 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FORRESTSTREAM'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING TURNOVER OF WATCHES, AUDI, AND PROCEEDS OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO LIEN SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED.As set forth in the attached, the court orders Mr. Shenkman (together w ith his counsel) to personally appear before the court on January 2, 2019, at 3:00 p.m., and show cause why Forreststream's application for an order directing turnover of certain wristwatches, an Audi automobile, and proceeds from property subje ct to Forreststream's lien should not be granted. The court further orders Mr. Shenkman to show cause why he should not be further sanctioned for noncompliance with the court's orders that he respond to Forreststream's discovery reques ts.If Mr. Shenkman wants to file any written response to Forreststream's application, he must do so by December 31, 2018, at noon. Forreststream may then file any written reply by January 2, 2019, at noon. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/2/2019 03:00 PM. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on December 26, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2018)
December 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 345 ORDER granting 328 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Forreststream Holdings Limited.As set forth in the attached order, the court finds that Mr. Shenkman willfully failed to comply with his discovery obligations and the court's June 14, 2018 order. The court sanctions Mr. Shenkman and allows Forreststream to take discovery into the hard-copy documents and data-storage devices at 28 Meadow Hill Drive, Tiburon, California 94920, as set forth in the modified protocol in the at tached order. (Broadly speaking, the court adopts Forreststream's proposed protocol with respect to the hard-copy documents and adopts in part and modifies in part Forreststream's proposed protocol with respect to the data-storage devices t o allow Mr. Shenkman's counsel an opportunity to review the data for non-responsiveness and privilege.)The court repeats its warning from the December 6, 2018 hearing that Mr. Shenkman must comply with all court orders. Failure to comply with a court order constitutes contempt, which may subject Mr. Shenkman to further sanctions, including monetary sanctions and incarceration. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on December 11, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2018)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 339 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 328 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.As set forth in the attached order, the court ENJOINS defendant Gregory Shenkman, Mr. Shenkman's agents, attorneys, and representatives, and all persons or entities acting in concert with Mr. Shenkman or on Mr. Shenkmans behalf, from engaging in any of the following conduct absent (1) express written permission from plaintiff Forreststream Holdings Ltd. or (2) further order of this court:(1) Remov ing, or causing or permitting the removal of, any document or data storage device from 28 Meadow Hill Drive, Tiburon, California 94920 (the "Property").(2) Accessing, or causing or permitting access to, any data stored on any device (inc luding any computer, computer server, memory stick, or other storage device) located on the Property.(3) Modifying, or causing or permitting modifications to, any data stored on any device (including any computer, computer server, memory stick, or other storage device) located on the Property.(4) Deleting, or causing or permitting the deletion of, any data stored on any device (including any computer, computer server, memory stick, or other storage device) located on the Property. At the hearing today, the court and the parties also discussed the process for taking discovery of the documents and data-storage devices. The parties are aware of the court's views on those issues, which the court will memorialize in a separate order.Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on December 6, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2018)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 321 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FORRESTSTREAM'S APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING TURNOVER OF SHARES SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED.As set forth in the attached, the court orders Mr. Shenkman to appear before the court on November 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m ., and show cause why Forreststream's application for an order directing turnover of Mr. Shenkman's shares in Return on Intelligence, Ltd., should not be granted. (This is in addition to the court's earlier order that Mr. Shenkman appe ar and show cause why Forreststream should not be granted leave to file a motion for sanctions.) Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/15/2018 09:30 AM. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on November 14, 2018. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 317 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FORRESTSTREAM SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS.As set forth in the attached order, the court warns Mr. Shenkman that he risks sanctions if he fails to comply with his discovery obligations or f ails to comply with any court order. The court orders Mr. Shenkman to appear before the court on November 15, 2018, at 9:30 a.m., and show cause why Forreststream should not be granted leave to file a motion for sanctions. The court further orders Mr . Shenkman to provide any written response to Forreststream's letter, ECF No. 316 , by November 9, 2018. Forreststream may submit a reply by November 13, 2018 at noon. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/15/2018 at 9:30 AM. Show Cause Response due by 11/9/2018. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/6/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018)
November 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 213 WRIT of Execution issued in the amount of $6,324,689.53 (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2017)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 172 ORDER granting applications to find claim of exemption and denying 151 Motion to Enforce Judgment as moot.The court finds that the Tiburon dwelling is subject to a homestead exemption of $100,000. It deferred its assessment of the fair market value for two weeks. Only Forreststream has put in reliable evidence of the property's value. The court will allow Mr. Shenkman to submit his own valuation but if he does not, the court likely will value the property at the appraised valu e. The parties agreed to confer on a plan to sell the property at its fair market value and to submit the plan to the court by September 28, 2017. The parties also must respond to Ms. Shenkman's filing by that date, and Ms. Shenkman may respo nd by October 2, 2017. The court set a further hearing for October 5, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. The court denies Forreststream's motion for an order determining the homestead exemption as moot.If the court has omitted anything necessary from its order that is relevant to the timing issues discussed at today's hearing, Forreststream may submit a proposed order, and the court will review and sign it today (to the extent that it is appropriate). The rulings on the record also should be sufficient. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 9/21/2017)
July 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER by Judge Beeler denying without prejudice 128 Forreststream's Motion For Assignment of Payments. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the court denies Forreststream's motion without prejudice to allow a record to be made about assignable payments through discovery and at the judgment debtor exam. The court sets a case-management conference for July 27, 2017, at 11 a.m. to discuss discovery and the judgment debtor exam. If the parties can navigate discovery without the court's intervention, the parties may vacate the July 27 case-management conference by stipulation. The attached order also sets forth a process for Forreststream's renewed motion.(Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 7/16/2017)
March 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. There are no genuine disputes of material fact. The court thus grants Forreststream's summary-judgment motion. Mr. Shenkman is personally liable for the loan, and he breached his obligation to pledge shares. The parties must confer and submit a stipulated form of judgment within one week (as discussed more fully in the attached order).(Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/24/2017)
February 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 97 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Reschedule Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/9/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 02/15/2017. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)
July 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STIPULATATED ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF REGARDING PLEDGE OF EQUITY INTERESTS IN EIS GROUP LTD AND @MOSPHERE, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/26/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Forreststream Holdings Limited v. Shenkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Forreststream Holdings Limited
Represented By: Roberto J. Kampfner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory Shenkman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?