Garcia v. Midland Credit Management Transunion
Marta Garcia |
Midland Credit Management and Transunion |
3:2016cv01997 |
April 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Edward M. Chen |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC ONLY filed by Equifax. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/13/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016) |
Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Of Dismissal With Prejudice Between Plaintiff And Defendant Trans Union, LLC Only filed by Transunion. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/26/16. Copy mailed to Plaintiff(bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2016) |
Filing 25 ORDER re 24 Notice of Dismissal as to Midland Credit only filed by Midland Credit Management. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/10/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2016) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 15 , 16 . The parties' stipulation to extend Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc.'s Deadline to Respond to the Complaint to May 23, 2016 is granted. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/20/2016. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.