Cottrell v. Cordis Corporation et al
Deanna Cottrell |
Cordis Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Cardinal Health, Inc. |
3:2016cv02500 |
May 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jeffrey S. White |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND GRANTING REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY. Supplemental Responses due by 11/14/2016. Replies due by 11/21/2016. Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Jeffrey S. White. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/3/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2016) |
Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING 38 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Cordis Corporation to Respond to 36 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 5, 2016. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016) |
Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING 34 STIPULATION to Dismiss Cardinal Health, Inc. Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/21/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2016) |
Filing 17 ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/5/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/12/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/25/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2016) Modified on 5/25/2016 (jjoS, COURT STAFF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.