Patino et al v. Franklin Credit Management Corporation et al
Penny L. Patino and Penny L. Patino's Living Trust |
Franklin Credit Management Corporation, Bosco Credit LLC and Wolf Firm Corporation, The |
3:2016cv02695 |
May 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Laurel Beeler |
Foreclosure |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting 75 Motion to Dismiss. The court dismisses the plaintiff's TILA claim with prejudice because it is barred by the statute of limitations. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her state-law claims and so dismisses those claims without prejudice. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2017) |
Filing 74 ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting the plaintiff's temporary restraining order and establishing the process forward. ECF Nos. 67 , 69 , 70 . (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2017) |
Filing 51 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion to Dismiss.The court grants in part the defendants' motion and dismisses Ms. Patino's TILA claim but grants leave to amend. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her state-law claims at this time and dismisses them without prejudice. Ms. Patino may file an amended complaint within four weeks. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.