DOE v. George Street Photo & Video, LLC
JANE DOE |
George Street Photo & Video, LLC |
3:2016cv02698 |
May 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Marin |
Maria-Elena James |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 107 SCREENING ORDER re 102 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Jane Doe. The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and file a statement by 8/30/2019 as to whether (1) they can stipulate to Doe filing a second amended complaint in compliance with this screening order or (2) the Court should request that the Clerk of Court reassign this case with a report and recommendation. No chambers copy is required. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 8/16/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2019) |
Filing 95 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 90 Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint. The complaint shall be e-filed as a separate docket entry (no chambers copy is required). Joint Case Management Statement due by 8/15/2019. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/22/2019 10:00 AM. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2019) |
Filing 81 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson re: 72 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED AS MOOT. Case Management Statement due by 10/18/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 10/25/2018 10:00 AM. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2018) |
Filing 42 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 29 Motion to Compel Arbitration; Staying Case. (mejlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016) |
Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2016) |
Filing 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff should be allowed to keep proceeding pseudonymously. Show Cause Response due by 10/6/2016. Order vacating 9/29/2016 Case Management Conference.Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action due by 10/13/2016. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 9/26/2016. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2016) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 10 Ex Parte Application to Proceed Under a Pseudonym and for a related Protective Order; ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference to 9/29/2016. Plaintiff is ORDERED to serve Defendant(s) with a copy of this Order within 21 days of its filing and to file a proof of service of such with the Court. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DOE v. George Street Photo & Video, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JANE DOE | |
Represented By: | Henry M. Burgoyne, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: George Street Photo & Video, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.