Blackburn v. Oracle America, Inc.
| Svetlana Blackburn |
| Oracle America, Inc. |
| 3:2016cv02925 |
| June 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Svetlana Blackburn. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/17/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2017)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 42 VACATING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT filed by Oracle America, Inc. Status Report due by 3/9/2017. Status Conference reset for 3/16/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/8/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR STIPULATED RULE 502(d) ORDER filed by Oracle America, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 to Continue Initial CMC filed by Svetlana Blackburn. Case Management Statement due by 11/3/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/10/2016 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/1/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
