Lowenthal v. Quicklegal, Inc. et al
| Justin C Lowenthal |
| Quicklegal, Inc., Lawyers On Demand, Inc., Quicklegal Practice Management, Inc., Derek Bluford, Cyrus Zal, Ricky Delgado, Aaron Timm and Sonia Chambers |
| 3:2016cv03237 |
| June 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Yolo |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER GRANTING 104 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/17/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2017)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler re motions at ECF Nos. 17, 24, 27, 30, 38, 42. The court denies in part and grants in part the defendants' motions. The court denies the defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction . The court dismisses Mr. Lowenthal's claims against defendants Timm, Chambers, and Delgado but grants leave to amend. The other claims survive. Mr. Lowenthal may amend his complaint within 21 days of the date of this order.The court denies M r. Zal's motion to quash. Because Mr. Zal did not file a responsive motion, the court makes no finding as to the sufficiency of the complaint against him. Mr. Zal may file a responsive motion (if he chooses) within 14 days of the due date for Mr. Lowenthal's amended complaint (whether or not he files an amended complaint). (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
