Chaka Franklin v. Credence Resource Management, LLC

Plaintiff: Chaka Franklin
Defendant: Credence Resource Management, LLC
Case Number: 3:2016cv03834
Filed: July 8, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 21, 2016 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 14 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/21/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chaka Franklin v. Credence Resource Management, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chaka Franklin
Represented By: Lee Paul Mankin, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credence Resource Management, LLC
Represented By: Harijot Singh Khalsa
Represented By: Debbie Paulerio Kirkpatrick
Represented By: Damian Patrick Richard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?