Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Hilfiker Pipe Company et al
Californians for Alternatives to Toxics |
Hilfiker Pipe Company, Harold K. Hilfiker and Kerry R. Glavich |
3:2016cv04152 |
July 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Humboldt |
Jon S. Tigar |
Environmental Matters |
33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 Stipulation to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 17, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION TO EXTEND FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a) DOCUMENT DISCLOSURE AND SET SITE INSPECTION; filed by Hilfiker Pipe Company, Harold K. Hilfiker. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 29, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2016) |
Filing 16 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES re 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Hilfiker Pipe Company. Case Management Statement due by 11/21/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 17, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2016) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Hilfiker Pipe Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 13, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.